Tuesday, April 29, 2014

We are now in the midst of a season of greatly heightened Satanic ritual, so stay on guard.


The Open Scroll Blog

Posted: 28 Apr 2014 10:58 AM PDT
We are now in the midst of a season of greatly heightened Satanic ritual, so stay on guard. The season of preparation has just past, where the victims chosen for sacrifice have been abducted and prepared. The Grand Climax extends from 4/26 to 5/1, and the rituals actually continue through 5/3. 4/30 is Walpurgisnacht, Roodmas Day or Beltane Eve, the greatest Witches Sabbat. May 1 is May Day, Beltane or Walpurgis Day.

Tuesday the 29th, there will be an annular solar eclipse that will add substantially to the Adversary's provisioning of this season as it is leveraged by Occult ritual.

Yesterday, the big event was in Rome where both Popes held a double canonization at the Vatican, sponsored by corporate interests. Their event was broadcast globally in 3D High Def projection from their 13 (rebel-lord-beast) cameras stationed around St. Peter's Square. It included a Mass with Eucharist, which I've just written about. I exposing that ritual as a baptism and anointing of the beast that celebrates the implicit 13th day of the 1st month. (When Will the Lawless One be Revealed? Ninth Installment) The mark of the beast symbol surrounding the obelisk was filled with and surrounded by a million worshipers. Truly, a MASS ritual.

Related Observations

Man crushed to death by giant crucifix dedicated to Pope

The POPE/PROJECT BLUE BEAM/ In 6 Days Worldwide in 3D (BPEarthWatch)

John Paul II canonization sponsored by banks, oil giant

"Public displays in the modern era are rare. The last one was in 2010. The next one wasn't supposed to be until 2025, but Pope Francis caught the faithful off guard in December when he moved it up to next year, authorizing a three-month public exhibition that will begin April 19." (Showing of the shroud of Turin)

This past Saturday night, after the checkered flag waved ending the NASCAR Cup race in Richmond, VA (Virginia is for Lovers), two drivers had a fight. The driver of car #9 punched the driver of car #13 in the left eye. "Mears wore sunglasses for most of Sunday's event, but it was clear the punch left a gnarly bruise and swollen left eye." (source)

The 13 rebel-lord-beast as Horus, who rules with two eyes, i.e. Harmerty with his left eye darkened. The left eye was darkened by #9, which is the single digit number of the beast transformation. The transformation manifested in the black eye. The driver of #9 is Marcos Ambrose. “Mark us” with the mark of the beast. Ambrosia - nectar of the gods. He gave the other driver the mark, transforming him with a darkening of the left eye into Horus. The driver of #13 is Casey Mears. Double Code 33. C is the 3rd letter and M is a rotated 3 so CM ~ 33. Casey ~ KC and K is 11th letter and C is 3rd, so KC ~ 3*11=33.

Mears, the meaning of the name is someone who lived near a boundary, or pond - the beast seen rising from the sea. The car's main sponsor is Geico and a picture of their mascot is featured on the car's hood. It's a gecko, a lizard and reptile, of the serpent family. This one talks and walks upright and acts like a human, so it's a beast. The sponsor's schtick with the gecko is a confusion of identity, Geico ~ gecko so there's the (messianic) identity swap.

Of Interest

Anubis stationed at the Gateway to the West (See Series Links: Celestial Stargates)

MAY 16TH MARCH ON THE CAPITOL - “Peter in the Garden 2.0” - synched to the Black Awakening?

Saturday, April 26, 2014

New World Order Police Recruiting Video for Arkansas

Apr 24, 2014
comments are disabled for recruiting vid, wonder why lol

"Racism" Press Release From Cliven Bundy

  Bundy Ranch


Friday, April 25, 2014 

We are trading one form of slavery for another.

What I am saying is that all we Americans are trading one form  of slavery for another.  All of us are in some measure slaves of the federal government.  Through their oppressive tactics of telling the ranchers how many cows  they can have on their land, and making that  number too low to support a ranch, the BLM has  driven every rancher in Clark County off the land, except me.  The IRS keeps the people of America in fear, and makes us all work about a third or a half of the year before we have earned enough to pay their taxes.  This is nothing but slavery from January through May.  The NSA spies on us and collects our private phone calls and emails.  And  the government dole which many people in America are on, and have been for much of their lives, is dehumanizing and degrading.  It takes away incentive to work and self respect.  Eventually a person on the dole becomes a ward of the government, because his only source of income is a dole from the government.  Once the government has you in that position, you are its slave.

I am  trying to keep Martin Luther King Jr.'s dream alive.  He was praying for the day when he and his people would be free, and he could say I’m free, free at last, thank God I’m free at last! But all of us here America, no matter our race, are having our freedom eroded and destroyed by the federal government because of its heavy handed tactics.  The BLM, the IRS, the NSA--all of the federal agencies are destroying our freedom.  I am standing up against their bad  and unconstitutional laws, just like Rosa Parks did when she refused to sit in the back of the bus.  She started a revolution  in America, the civil rights movement, which freed the black people from much of the oppression they were suffering. I'm saying Martin Luther King's dream was not that Rosa could take her rightful seat in the front of the bus, but his dream was that she could take any seat on the bus and I would be honored to sit beside her.   I am doing the same thing Rosa Parks did--I am standing up against bad laws which dehumanize us and destroy our freedom.  Just like the Minutemen at Lexington and Concord, we are saying no to an oppressive government which considers us  to be slaves rather  than free men.

 I invite all people in America to join in our peaceful revolution to regain our freedom.  That is how America was started, and we need to keep that tradition alive.

Cliven D. Bundy

Does Washington Want War With Russia?

 (this article is, imo, a very important summary of the ridiculous posturing by the Western Banksters in Ukraine, trying their best to drag us into direct conflict with Russia . .  however the writer seems to be hopelessly lost in the thinking that socialism is the answer to capitalism . .  when all we have ever needed is a Free Market . .  Capitalism & Socialism are one and the same . .  a few cruel Banksters at the top, and death and misery for the 99% . . .)

By Bill Van Auken

April 24, 2014 "ICH" - "WSWS" - Does Washington want a war with Russia? A review of recent US actions surrounding the crisis in Ukraine clearly poses what would have once seemed an unthinkable question. The Obama administration is playing a very dangerous game of Russian Roulette.

In the last 48 hours, the Pentagon has announced the deployment of US paratrooper units to Poland and the three former Baltic republics of the Soviet Union—Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania—bringing US troops to Russia’s very border. Another American warship has been dispatched to the Black Sea and more US forces are slated to deploy to Ukraine itself this summer under an exercise known as Operation Rapid Trident.

These military moves by Washington are unfolding in the context of an acute crisis within Ukraine that, thanks to the machinations of Washington and its puppets, threatens to erupt into full-blown civil war.

Less than one week after signing a joint statement with Russia, the US and the European Union in Geneva pledging to end all violence in Ukraine and disarm illegal groups, the US puppet regime in Kiev has ordered its military to carry out an “anti-terrorist” crackdown against the restive Russian-speaking population in the country’s industrial southeast. To that end it has dispatched not only troops, tanks and warplanes, but also armed thugs from the neo-fascist Right Sector.

The Putin government in Moscow, which has desperately searched for an accommodation with Washington, appears to be waking up to the deadly seriousness of the situation. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov warned in an English-language interview with the state-run RT television channel Wednesday that his government would treat an attack on Russian citizens in Ukraine as an attack on Russia itself. He raised as a precedent the August 2008 offensive launched by the government of Georgia on Russians in South Ossetia, to which Russia responded by intervening militarily to repel Georgian forces.

The implication that the Russian government would carry out a similar intervention to stop Ukrainian troops from slaughtering Russian-speaking civilians in the Donbas region should be treated with the utmost seriousness.

In the interview, Lavrov also observed, referring to the actions of the government in Kiev, that “the Americans are running the show in a very close way.” This is indisputable. The regime itself is the product of a protracted American intervention in the country’s internal affairs, with some $5 billion in so-called “democracy promotion” funding pumped into Ukraine since the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991.

These efforts culminated in the fomenting of a right-wing opposition movement to destabilize the Russian-aligned government of President Viktor Yanukovych by means of street violence. When a deal was brokered between the opposition and Yanukovych, Washington ensured that it was scuttled and the elected president overthrown by fascist paramilitary forces.
The prime minister of the regime brought to power by the February 22 fascist-led coup, Arseniy Yatsenyuk, was handpicked by US officials, who affectionately referred to him as “Yats.”

The point person for this operation has been US Undersecretary of State for Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland, a former chief security adviser to Vice President Dick Cheney and the wife of Robert Kagan, the founding chairman of the Project for a New American Century. She has brought to Ukraine and to Russia itself the same policy of aggressive war that was implemented in the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

The way in which Washington calls the shots has been demonstrated in an even more sinister fashion with the launching of the first abortive “counterterrorist” operation in the Donbas in the immediate aftermath of a covert trip to Kiev by CIA Director John Brennan, and then its resumption in the immediate aftermath of this week’s visit by Vice President Joseph Biden.

From start to finish, the Ukraine crisis has been instigated by US imperialism. Every action Washington has taken has been directed at exacerbating and intensifying this crisis. The longer this crisis goes on, the clearer it becomes that US policy is directed not so much at Ukraine as at Russia itself. Ukraine, it would seem, is meant merely to provide the pretext for a war with Russia.
Short of that, it would be used to force a humiliating capitulation by Moscow that would only set the stage for redoubled aggression aimed at Russia’s dismemberment and transformation into a powerless semi-colony.

Presumably, those in the White House and the Pentagon believe that such a conflict would stop short of a nuclear war, but who knows?

The threat of a US war on Russia is also apparent in the flood of war propaganda being unleashed upon the public. Vladimir Putin is being subjected to the same kind of demonization previously reserved for Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi, while the State Department and its faithful scribes at the New York Times serve up “photographic evidence” of Russian troops in Ukraine that has all the authenticity of similar “proofs” of Iraq’s “weapons of mass destruction.”

What underlies the US war drive? In the run-up to the Ukraine crisis, Washington had grown increasingly incensed by Moscow’s role in blocking US war plans against both Syria and Iran, not to mention Putin’s granting of asylum to NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden. Earlier, there was the fiasco that Moscow dealt Washington in the US-backed 2008 war launched by Georgia against South Ossetia. The events in Ukraine suggest that US imperialism has embarked on a strategy to eliminate Russia as an obstacle to its drive to assert hegemony over the Middle East and, more broadly, the landmass of Eurasia.

There are also internal factors driving Washington to war. Social contradictions within the United States have reached a dangerous intensity. Masses of working people continue to bear the brunt of the capitalist economic crisis, even as Wall Street recoups its losses from the 2008 collapse and grows richer than ever. More and more fingers are pointing at the super-rich as the party responsible for unprecedented social inequality and misery in America.
As so often in the past, war provides an external outlet for internal social pressures and the danger of domestic unrest. Under conditions of overwhelming popular hostility to military intervention, one thing is certain: a war with Russia would rapidly lead to the shredding of the Constitution, the abrogation of democratic rights, the outlawing of political opposition and a massive escalation of police state measures.

The greatest danger would be to underestimate the threat of war. Even if it is averted or postponed in the immediate instance, the profound contradictions of the imperialist system make the catastrophe of a nuclear Third World War not just a danger, but an inevitability, outside of the working class mobilizing its strength internationally in a unified movement to put an end to capitalism.

Ninth Circle Cult - Pope Francis

(This article sat in one of my browsers for several days . .  it is very dark and most of this kind of info, even if true, will be very difficult to 'prove' to a skeptic . .  that said, I had about decided not to post it, and closed the browser window . .  Then, for some reason, I wanted to look at it one more time, so I did several searches, and would find links, but EVERY ONE of them had been removed, no longer existed . .  I searched for the original writer on the Examiner, Judy Byington, and all of her articles are gone . .  I was able to find this copy of the article on a cache, so for the sake of trying to preserve a history of the article, I am posting it . .  read it or not . .  believe it or not . .  it is information, and your choice what to do with it . . )


Witnesses testify that Pope Francis raped them while participating in child sacrifice rituals

This article was based on today's exclusive interview with Kevin Annett of the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State on this week's litigation in the Brussels Common Law Court of Justice. Five judges and 27 jury members from six countries including the USA, considered evidence on over 50,000 missing Canadian, US, Argentine and European children who were suspected victims of an international child sacrificial cult referred to as the Ninth Circle.

Two adolescent women claimed that Pope Francis raped them while participating in child sacrifices. Eight eyewitnesses confirmed the allegations according to evidence presented this week at a Brussels Common Law Court of Justice. The Ninth Circle Satanic child sacrifice rituals were said to take place during the Springs of 2009 and 2010 in rural Holland and Belgium.

Pope Francis was also a perpetrator in satanic child sacrifice rites while acting as an Argentine priest and Bishop according to records obtained from the Vatican archives. A prominent Vatican official and former Vatican Curia employee obtained the sealed documents for use by the court. This was not the first time satanic activities were suspected to be at the Vatican according to this ABC news story.

Another witness was set to testify that they were present during Pope Francis' meetings with the military Junta during Argentine's 1970's Dirty War. According to the witness, Pope Francis helped traffic children of missing political prisoners into an international child exploitation ring run by an office at the Vatican.

Evidence of a Catholic Jesuit Order document called the "Magisterial Privilege" was presented in court by the Chief Prosecutor. The record dated Dec. 25 1967 was said to show that every new Pope was required to participate in Ninth Circle Satanic ritual sacrifices of newborn children, including drinking their blood.

"Documents from Vatican secret archives presented to court clearly indicate that for centuries the Jesuits had a premeditated plan to ritually murder kidnapped newborn babies and then consume their blood," the Chief Prosecutor told the five international judges and 27 jury members. "The plan was born of a twisted notion to derive spiritual power from the lifeblood of the innocent, thereby assuring political stability of the Papacy in Rome. These acts are not only genocidal but systemic and institutionalized in nature. Since at least 1773, they appear to have been performed by the Roman Catholic Church, Jesuits and every Pope."

Two witnesses claimed that as children they were at child sacrifices with the former Pope Joseph Ratzinger. Since at least 1962 Ratzinger participated in child sacrifices as a member of the Knights of Darkness according to the Vatican records presented at court. Ratzinger was an S.S. Chaplain's assistant at the German Ravensbruck Concentration Camp during World War II. The children to be killed were supplied from prisoners at the death camp. The Nazi Waffen S.S. Division Knights of Darkness was established by Hitler in 1933 and embraced ancient pagan occult beliefs in human sacrifice.

Dutch Therapist-ritual abuse survivor Toos Nijenhuis testified of her witness to child sacrifice in this video. "Survivors of these rituals describe newborn babies being chopped to pieces on stone altars and their remains consumed by participants" the Chief Prosecutor said."During the 1960's the survivor-witnesses were forced to rape and mutilate other children and then cut their throats with ceremonial daggers."

According to witnesses Pope Francis, former Pope Joseph Ratzinger, Jesuit Superior General Adolfo Pachon and Anglican Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby were participants in the Ninth Circle Satanic child sacrifice cult rape and killing of children. Evidence also could link to cult ceremonies UK High Court Justice Judge Fulford, members of the British Royal Family including Prince Phillip, Dutch Cardinal Alfrink, Dutch Queen Wilhemina, her family and consort King Hendrick, Belgian Royals and Bilderberger founder Crown Prince Bernhard.

Documentation of The Canada Gazette Issue No. 232, December 26 1942, Ottawa was also presented to court. Evidently and unfortunately, the Canadian government and Privy Council Office in London granted to the Dutch royals, exception from all criminal, civil and military jurisdiction. What would make these global leaders exempt from justice?

The Chief Prosecutor presented alleged links between the British, Dutch and Belgian royal families to disappearances of Mohawk children at Canada's Church of England's Brantford Ontario Indian residential school. In 2008 a child mass gravesite was discovered at the Mohawk School. An ITCCS dig by archeologists was shut down when remains of a small child was uncovered.

Since then over 30 child mass grave sites have been located at Indian residential schools across Canada. The Catholic and Anglican Churches, United Church of Canada, Canadian government and Crown of England have refused ITCCS' repeated requests for excavation of the mass grave sites.

"This week conclusive evidence was presented that the Catholic Church is perpetrating ongoing crimes against children," the Chief Prosecutor stated. "The Catholic Church is the world's largest corporation and appears to be in collusion with governments, police and courts worldwide."

The Ninth Circle Satanic child sacrifice cult was said to operate at Roman Catholic cathedrals in Montreal, New York, Rome and London according to evidence filed in court. Witnesses claimed child sacrifices took place at Carnarvon Castle in Wales, an undisclosed French Chateau and at Canadian Catholic and Anglican Indian residential schools in Kamloops, British Columbia and Brantford, Ontario. The Ninth Circle Satanic child sacrifice cult was believed to use privately owned forest groves in the US, Canada, France and Holland.

Yesterday the five international magistrates adjourned court for two weeks and considered continuing in closed sessions. This week's closed court was held in an undisclosed location due to notification that the Vatican had released a Jesuit "hit squad" to disrupt proceedings. 
link to cached article   http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:22h3eqtcgQYJ:www.sott.net/article/277847-Witnesses-testify-that-Pope-Francis-raped-them-while-participating-in-child-sacrifice-rituals+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a

The very essence of the cabal’s misdeeds, the financial system, exposed for all to see. What was the response? Total silence.

Project Camelot

About 48 - Paladin Speaks Out

About 48…

For those of you familiar with the White Hats Reports, you’re aware that we have suspended publishing reports, and more importantly, failed to release report #48 as promised. I have been asked about that on numerous occasions in the recent weeks and months and feel perhaps I should address it here.

Our objective with these reports was primarily to continue the exposure of the withholding of the World Global Settlements (WGS) funds, the Wanta Funds, the CMKX debacle and the various other financial frauds perpetrated by the cabal on well meaning individuals. The primary focus was to let the cabal know that we KNEW and also to connect some dots for others (law enforcement, world leaders, etc) in the optimistic sense that they would respond in some positive way. Informing the general public at large was secondary to the main objective.

History will dictate whether the reports have had or will have any effect on the cabal’s stranglehold on humanity. I sincerely hope they do but I may not live to see that day. Our intent was always to expose the fraudulent financial system as it is the foundation for the cabal’s control of our lives. We are/were not partisan in any way as we exposed both parties in the US political arena in addition to cabalists in other countries. Our agenda was simple… to put pressure on the cabal and others in the desire to see change occur for the good of the people and all humanity.

As our readership grew, we began to see a change in the way we were perceived. It appeared that some were under the impression that we were constantly stating opinions and not reporting facts. This was and still is, amusing to us, as the complete lack of knowledge and understanding of the “game” did not prevent many from voicing opinions based on… their opinion. As I stated previously, the objective of the reports was not to convince the public of their authenticity but to put pressure on the cabal.

From the beginning, we were getting feedback through various sources that our reports were hitting the mark in terms of getting the attention of both the cabal and world leaders all around the globe. The exposure was constant and steady and in most cases, in real time as some reports detailed events that had occurred a day or two prior. All the while we were walking a fine line between exposing the truth and exposing operatives who risked everything to get us the information. In so doing, we had to keep in mind the method of exposure had to protect the ongoing flow of future information by not revealing the sources and/or methods.

I suppose the birth of report 48 occurred on February 16, 2012 when Lord David James of Blackheath courageously stood up in the House of Lords and delivered his speech exposing the $15 trillion dollar fraud perpetrated by the Federal Reserve, the US secret government, the criminal banking system and the corrupt politicians who are paid to look the other way when we the people of the US are put further in debt to support the slave status we’re all part of.


We then issued two reports in the next week which detailed not only the origination of our group but also included a copy of one of the SWIFTS for authentication. (See White Hats report #36 and #37 at http://tdarkcabal.blogspot.com/). The historic significance of this event, Lord James’ speech, cannot be underestimated. For the first time, the very essence of the cabal’s misdeeds, the financial system, was exposed for all to see. And what was the response?

Total silence.

Not one mainstream media outlet reported on the story. Not one investigation was started to look into the matter as Lord James implored his colleagues to do. And not one peep from the public for demanding an investigation and response to why $15 trillion of their money that happened to get transferred overseas to some obscure entity named Pureheart Investments, LTD.

Not one.

We had begun investigating Pureheart before Lord James’ historic speech in the House of Lords but once reports 36 and 37 were released, we were deluged with various individuals and entities reaching out to us in an effort to assist in the exposure of the real story behind Pureheart. Out of this, report #48 was born. The deeper we went down the trail, the more bizarre and mind blowing it became. For us, who’ve seen our share of bizarre and mind blowing, it was something deeper… more sinister, than we’ve ever experienced. Through this process, we were able to gather documents and information which related to Pureheart’s formation, history, alliances, key players and most important of all, their objectives. This set us on a path that took us out of the realm of the financial system and into the world of black projects, secret deals with foreign countries touted by the whore media to be our enemies, advanced technology and alien contacts.

Bits and pieces of this story had been exposed over the years. The Black Eagle Trust, the Five Star Trust, the Russell Trust, Operation “Hammer”, Yamashita’s Gold, and Confessions of an Economic Hitman are just a few of the dots that could now be connected to the secret/shadow government. As we investigated the origins, we were able to follow it through to the present day and Pureheart.
Pureheart is the conduit for pilfering money out of the financial system and taking it down that dark hole into the abyss, only to resurface in several different places, all for the advancement of the cabal’s control over humanity. Black projects, false flags, payoffs and bribes to politicians and public officials, blackmail, murder, assassination, satanic rituals, agreements with off-worlders and numerous and ongoing crimes against humanity. The denial of access to the secret technology that the masses pay for but the cabal utilizes in order to better control us and systematically take away our sovereign rights.

The origins of Pureheart trace back to GOT, SA (Global Oil Traders), two Saudi kings, Lucky Luciano and the five originators of the secret government (hence, the Five Star Trust) Bush, Sr., Edward Lansdale, William Colby, Roberto Ferrara aka Lorin Rosier and Richard Armitage. Ferrera faking his own death and recreated as Lorin Rossier, living in a safe house in Europe with an underground tunnel system that allows him to come and go without being surveilled. A corporate attorney (former) of Pureheart who reached out to us giving us information and claiming the cabal possessed technology advanced 10,000 years of what is in the public domain.

A compelling story, to say the least.

Pureheart is a GSE which stands for Government-Sponsored Enterprise. Other examples of a GSE are Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and FICO. I guarantee if you look up the purpose and function of GSEs, it won’t tell you that they were created by Congress to steal trillions of dollars of US taxpayer’s money for crimes against humanity. And that’s EXACTLY what Pureheart does and has been doing for many years.

But I digress.

When we assembled all the data… the notes of meetings, the joint venture contracts with other countries, the various documents relating to solicitations, the notes of conversations and the vetting of most of it, we came to the conclusion that it would be a major expose’ of the cabal. And I don’t use the term major lightly. Its one thing to talk or write about it, it’s entirely another to provide proof in the form of documents numbering in the hundreds of pages.

The discussion of releasing 48 spanned several days and weeks with consideration given to every conceivable response and repercussion. Pros and cons weighed and debated… sometimes heatedly… before reaching the conclusion in favor of delaying the release. We were fully cognizant of putting many people in harm’s way, including ourselves. The vast number of documents we received and contacts from information sources after Lord James’ historic speech was truly overwhelming. The cons were first and foremost our own safety and the safety of others involved directly and indirectly. We could decide to jeopardize ourselves and our families but we couldn’t make that decision for other people. Due to the nature and extreme sensitivity of the documents, the list of leakers/whistleblowers who assisted with this effort would be a very short list, easily narrowed. Another factor on the con side of things was the issue of possibly jeopardizing other phases of actions being taken at the time and are ongoing. Another factor—I’m not sure whether it’s pro or con—has to do with the fact that world leaders, politicians, etc., already knew about most of the info contained in 48. So in that regard, no new information would be provided other than perhaps some details or deals that not all were aware of.

In my mind, the apathy of the general public was the critical con factor that made the decision not to publish 48 a no-brainer. It seems no one thought… or understood… that the $15 Trillion fraud exposed by Lord James in February of 2012 impacted every taxpaying Amerikan. Most don’t know the Federal Reserve is a private corporation of cabal bankers that make the rules for themselves in the banking world without limitations. Most don’t understand that Federal income taxes are, in fact, interest payments on the debt of the out of control government. Most don’t know the dollar bills in their pockets are not cash but debt with the cabal given the freewheeling authority to print dollars ad infinitum because the Amerikan citizens are the collateral on the debt. Most don’t realize the reason an illegal alien is allowed to hold the office of President is because the US is a corporation and they have no such restrictions (being a US citizen) on corporate officers. And most don’t realize that the political parties are two sides of the same coin and have long ago sold us out to their financial contributors and corporate benefactors.

And even the ones who know all of the above are not doing enough. Just knowing isn’t enough… action needs to be taken or nothing will change. Perhaps it hasn’t dawned on everyone that the cavalry isn’t coming, the ET’s aren’t going to intervene and save us and no religious idols/icons are going to wave their hands and all will be good again.

The deafening silence after Lord James’ speech was evidence that our reports, at least from the reading public’s standpoint, had become nothing more than episodes in an ongoing drama serial that were mere entertainment. Like a Robert Ludlum spy novel or a Jerry Bruckheimer action movie.
If your house is on fire and you’ve been informed it’s on fire and you do nothing about it, what’s the point of having a smoke detector?

Now… this is not to say that at some appropriate point in time in the future, 48 won’t be released. Every precaution has been taken to preserve both the integrity of the report and security of the documents. I have been informed that our reports have made an impact and changes are occurring for the better as a result. Personally, I see very little sign of that but I remain hopeful. I do know the cabal has been seriously challenged on their plans and agenda but I’m not convinced we’re going to be any better off trading one type of tyranny for another.

Apologies are extended to those of our readers who were not given an explanation after the ill advised and ill conceived publicity and build up surrounding the release of report 48. Hopefully this will put the issue to rest, at least for the time being. However, I’ll provide this link to a report one of our colleagues put out that gives an overview of what we discovered. There are hundreds of pages of documents that back up the information contained in this report.

The follow up information articulated by Kerry should also be read to connect all the dots.


May 6, 2012 – The White Hats Report #41 

Truth That Dared To Speak Its Name

On the 16th of February, 2012, in the House of Lords, one courageous man, akin to Churchill attempting alone to warn of the Nazis threat to peace, Lord James of Blackheath, showed the vision, integrity, and fortitude to stand up, be counted, and expose to the House of Lords, the stark evidence of Global Fraud, which he so eloquently stated “there may have been a massive piece of money-laundering committed by a major Government who should know better.”   Also, in his words, “a major American department has an agency which has gone rogue.”  This is a scam of major size and a key to the recovery of the money needed to immediately boost America’s economy, stabilize the EU and fund the Global Settlements.

Lord David James of Blackheath

Lord James invited The House of Lords to assess the implications of his concerns and requested a full inquiry.  While MI6 played around the edges, focused Treasury minds have still not commenced with the thorough investigation needed, nor has the UK Treasury or Foreign Office stood-up and sought to establish the truth.  Lord Sassoon missed the whole point by passing it off with a presumption that, if the Gold claimed was bogus, it was just a scam from Wilfredo Saurin.  He purposely overlooked the real issue; money raised against gold that does not exist is fraudulent.  Sassoon should know that grandstanding can make or break careers. 

The consequences of what Noble Lord James was seeking to expose are far reaching.  He was offering a key to the Pandora’s Box of the uncontrolled Cabal and corrupt US agency, with activities carried out not in the interests of Sovereign protection, but for the usurping interests of corrupt banking, political and agency greed.  The extent of the fraud may be too great for State Agency staff to understand, as Sassoon has shown by failing to look into it, so perhaps someone needs to help them all understand our real dangers and risks.  This may help a significant group of international leaders and governments to finally grasp what has been and still is happening.   What follows will expand consciousness of this very nasty reality to focus on the key issues and to assist prosecution.

The “agency” Lord James previously raised concerns about in the House of Lords, which he prudently referred to as Foundation X, is in fact the Pureheart Investment operation run by General Lorin William Rossier and assisted by dubious Chief Attorney Marlon McCall.  This “agency” is claimed by McCall to be a subsidiary of Homeland Security, a fact supported by the UN and Homeland codes interjected into their SWIFT transfers for the identified 15 Trillion USD raised by FRAUD, with no Congressional awareness, oversight or permission.   Why is the US Congress not getting this?  15T USD was heisted on YOUR watch Congressman Issa!  Where is our Standards Committee now? 

Lord James had originally been approached by Marlon McCall, in turn linked with Sandip Goyal and the notorious Asian Con Man Wilfredo Saurin, with dual intent.

Wilfredo Saurin

On one hand, they were seeking to offer a too-good-to-be-true 6 billion pounds loan to Her Majesty’s Government, which they had on deposit at HSBC.  They also sought Lord James’ assistance to get HSBC and others to acknowledge the 15T USD, which had been wired previously by JP Morgan, on behalf of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, via HSBC, for further credit to the Royal Bank of Scotland, for the Pureheart account, now sequestrated by rogue RBS bankers.  Poetic justice prevails, as scammers got scammed by the Bankers.

The LWR, GOT S.A., and Pureheart Investments, appears to be a vehicle operated in conjunction with the US Fed, Treasury, and selective US Agencies, with even UN complicity as shown by the attached SWIFTS.  All these entities were cross-compromised by McCall having spent eight weeks in the hospital, preventing the Agency from playing its full role in the US Debt ceiling crisis in August 2011, where the 15T USD debt shortfall was miraculously solved out of thin air utilizing this fraudulent operation. 

Pureheart is an unregulated and covert operation of the US Government, with possible links to the Revenue Sustainability Fund (RSF), which funds should have been utilized by the Fed /Treasury to prepare the way for the imminent Global Settlements, which continue to be blocked by the self-interests of the Rothschild’s, Bush’s, and the Heritage Funds.  These funds, once released, would help prepare the way for the critical and necessary re alignment of all major global trading currencies, but most importantly, the consolidation of substantial sovereign debts owed. The world’s biggest problem is lack of economic stability, which we can begin to solve by taking this money and paying the Settlements.

In some areas the RSF has been using Pureheart for several years as a means of clandestinely distributing large volumes of dollars into sovereign economies as a means of maintaining the image of stability. However, this has been a double edged sword, which will be addressed later.

What took place was, in effect, a massive money laundering scheme. The US Treasury had run dry, so they defrauded the global monetary system by illegally creating additional money, which was subsequently stolen.  WE NEED TO DEMAND THIS MONEY BACK AND PAY THE GLOBAL SETTLEMENTS.  There is enough incriminating evidence to hold them all accountable.  The scale of collusion defies belief, yet it happened and still continues.  Congress and the House of Lords need to establish a Joint Task Force to immediately recover this money, and in one swift action, rebalance the world’s economies.

Pureheart functions with no direct oversight and with investigating parties being told “hands off” by key Central Banks, the Treasury, and by major intel agencies.  In an operation created by Pureheart, utilizing the notorious Wilfredo Saurin, the well-known international fraudster; a scam was set up to wire a total of 15T USD in three separate tranches of five trillion dollar SWIFT transfers from the Federal Reserve to the account of LWR, GOT S.A., Pureheart Investment to HSBC London, for further credit to Royal Bank of Scotland Global Plc.  The attached SWIFT transfers and confirmations reveal the smoking gun, including the SWIFT regarding the bogus gold.  This was a very sophisticated cross-agency and bank criminal operation known and colluded to at the highest level.  All the money can be traced. 
  • On the 20th of April 2009, the first tranche of five trillion dollars was wired using USD SWIFT transfer N: 400930153. The onward transfer from RBS to RBS Group used SWIFT transfer No: 8163708748 with confirmatory tracking and onward SEQUE 851962 at 4.53pm.
  • On the 27th of April 2009, the second tranche of five trillion dollars was made USD SWIFT Transfer No 4319901756. Confirmatory tracking SEQUE 924573 at 1.28pm.
  • On the 4th of May 2009, the third tranche of five trillion USD SWIFT Transfer No 1186308258. Confirmatory tracking and onward SEQUE 259043 at 2.14pm
  • On the 11th of May 2009, a 50 billion Euro transfer was made by SWIFT Transfer No: 4027105584.  Confirmatory tracking and transfer SEQUE 275903 at 2.25pm. (This was later to be pursued for release from HSBC by no other than the Fed Chairman himself coming out of the woodwork.)

 April 20, 2009

Now, an interesting scenario occurred when they transferred this “created money,” where asset backing was needed to balance the books.  They realized they had a serious compliance shortfall problem backing up the history of funds.  They needed to cook-the-books fast to give a credible asset to justify raising the cash.  So, on the 20th of May 2009, operating in conjunction with Wilfredo Saurin, they wired SKR’s (Safekeeping Receipts) from the Bank of Indonesia (BI) for an alleged gold bullion transfer of 750,000 metric tons.  It was of course bogus and fraudulent.  Attached is the issued SWIFT Transfer No 4200754365.  Confirmatory tracking and transfer SEQUE 194743 was also issued at 10:21 am. You will discover coincidentally from the BI SWIFTS, the sum amounts to the 15T USD needed to underpin the US Fed fraud.

This was all predicated by Saurin against the back up account of Yohannes Riyadi, which only holds 700 metric tons of gold, and can never be moved.  We have and hold copies of the real Bank of Indonesia custodial records and full Deputy President Confirmation of Riyadi’s account on a special Fed Bank of Indonesia sub platform.  Saurin has operated against Riyadi’s account for years, entrusted by Riyadi to act responsibly, but Saurin has caused him untold damage.  The entire chain of this money was a lie, a fraud, and a scam.  This means that 15T USD of falsely created money has been issued, traded, and laundered through the banking system making huge profits.  To whose benefit?  How much profit was made and where is it now?  We want it back with taxes levied, and in good hands helping the world.

The Fed’s accompanying instructions for the transfer of these funds, all personally authorized by Mr. Benjamin Bernanke, included instructions to utilize part Euro funds already lodged with HSBC for the Pureheart account.  This was the delay in processing this 50 Billion Euro portion of the transfers, perhaps “fees for the boys,” which caused Mr. Bernanke to fly to the UK and personally walk through the execution of this transfer.  This may possibly have been with the knowledge of Lord Stephen Green, who was the Chairman of HSBC at that time.  Euro funds later appeared, perhaps as pay offs, in the accounts of fraudsters Sandip Goyal and Wilfredo Saurin for assisting in executing this fraud.

When challenged about Saurin’s role, and imminent risk of arrest for his many scams, Marlon McCall openly stated that Wilfredo Saurin is a Federal Reserve Bank of New York protected agent, and will not be arrested as he is being protected by Homeland Security and the Fed as a managed agent.  That explains a lot!  Anyone issuing fraudulent US dollars is typically tracked down anywhere on the planet by the US, yet Saurin is always the Teflon man.  On one hand, Saurin appears on Fed warning sites, including many Asian media warnings of his many crimes and fee scams; but on the other hand, the FED deals and colludes with him. What shameful duplicity.

The deal offered by Pureheart to the UK to try to get these funds repatriated was as follows:
  1. One third was to go to the US Treasury.
  2. One third was to go to Pureheart.  To whom and for what purpose?
  3. One third was to go to the UK for “services rendered in providing shelter for these funds for two years.”
There has been a systematic failure by collective authorities to address this issue.  Since obstructionist cover-ups continue, we must do the following immediately:
  • Seize back the first one third with five trillion USD right now for US economic needs
  • Give nothing to Pureheart, and instead the second 5 Trillion USD comes back to the US
  • Use the last third to stabilize the UK and the EU
  • Identify the vast profits which will have now been made from these funds, recover it, and pay the Private and Global Settlements. 
  • Set up a Congressional Task Force and go after this money
This week, the walking wounded lame duck Royal Bank of Scotland, which assisted in fronting this fraud, is repaying its government bailout loan of 163 billion pounds (think 250 billion USD).  The Bank only made a declared trading profit of 1.2 billion pounds.  This is ‘Madoff Style’ accounting.  So clearly, vast amounts are hidden ‘Off Balance Sheet’ for one set of books, and ‘On Balance Sheet’ for another.  The US Fed, US Treasury, UK Treasury, and Bank of England need to set up an URGENT recovery team to find this money.  Her Majesty’s Government holds the key to unlocking and exposing this vast fraud.

McCall was crying - the Brits had frozen him out.  What a turn around.  For almost a century the Fed Scammers raided the planet, and now the Brits have pulled their pants down for 15T USD.
This 15T USD would easily have made over 50T USD in inter-bank trading.  Look at the taxes missed on those profits – approximately 20 Trillion USD.  The RBS Board is liable for criminal prosecution as are many others. The Bank of Indonesia has serious questions to answer here as well.  JP Morgan helped initiate this Fed scam and HSBC helped launder it.  We call for a joint Congressional, UK Lords, and Treasury Task Force to go after it all.  In one swoop, we stabilize the EU, UK and US economies.  Once released, the Global Settlement money will go towards funding infrastructure projects, creating jobs, increasing revenues, and reducing crime, thus reducing despair, creating hope and providing opportunity.  Wilfredo Saurin and Sandip Goyal are flagged on many sites.  Why do they have HSBC and Credit Suisse Bank accounts?  Who cleared them?




Sunday, April 20, 2014

Chemtrails Pathogen, Xenobiology & Engineered Bacteria - Vincent Freeman w/ Red Ice Radio


April 4, 2014

Vincent Freeman is a molecular biologist and artificial intelligence scientist who has worked on classified programs at some of the top-50 defense contractors. He has also conducted genetic and biological analysis for the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Vincent is currently volunteering his time as a senior consultant to the Carnicom Institute, a non-profit research organization whose goal is to identify and expose covert geo-engineering and bio-engineering. Vincent will discuss his current project that involves 'reverse-engineering' the fundamental structural biology involved in the 'chemtrails' pathogen. He is working closely with Clifford Carnicom to accomplish this task. Vincent will explain the biological evidence they have and explain the eerie properties of cross domain bacteria, a type of genetically engineered bacteria/nanomachine. In the second hour, we'll discuss Morgellons disease and how the population is already exposed and infected regardless of whether they have symptoms or not. He explains how infection can be proven via multiple scientific methods and what can be done to inhibit Morgellons growth. Also, Vincent discusses where CI is going in terms of research. Later, we discuss the evidence of covert bio-engineering and nanotechnology and how it works, as well as how these factors might play into the trans-humanist agenda.

Hour 2

Relevant linkscarnicominstitute.org
Donate to Carnicom Institute - Aerosol Bacterial Identification Kits Needed
The Structure of the Black Programs
Operation LAC
Zinc cadmium sulfide
The New Biology
Proof We Are All Infected
Craig Venter creates first synthetic life form
Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy
Morgellons:Growth Inhibition Confirmed
Growth Inhibition Achieved
Google's Quantum Computer Proven To Be Real Thing (Almost)
Cocaine, Conspiracy Theories And The Cia In Central America
Gary Webb's Incendiary 1996 SJ Mercury News Exposé

MusicPrometheus OST - Infected

The Resurrection Mural

Recreating The Resurrection

The Resurrection Mural, is a 40 foot by 12 foot oil on canvas mural by acclaimed artist, Ron DiCianni. Commissioned by The Museum of Biblical Art, this mural took over two years to create and involved movie studios to make a life size tomb, family members to assist with costumes for the models, and countless hours of prayer.

While the mural itself is breathtakingly beautiful, its purpose goes much deeper than just merely art. The Resurrection of Jesus Christ is the single most important occurrence in human history. This mural brings people in and lets them experience the moment in which Christ conquered the grave and stepped out of the tomb.

Saturday, April 19, 2014

New Studies Show Health Risks From Wireless Technology

Saturday, April 19, 2014

Warnings from the BioInitiative Working Group / University at Albany, Rensselaer, New York

Activist Post

The BioInitiative Working Group says evidence for health risk from wireless tech is growing stronger and warrants immediate action. The Group released a mid-year update covering new science studies from 2012 to 2014.

New studies intensify medical concerns about malignant brain tumors from cell phone use. “There is a consistent pattern of increased risk for glioma (a malignant brain tumor) and acoustic neuroma with use of mobile and cordless phones” says Lennart Hardell, MD, PhD at Orebro University, Sweden, according to studies released in 2012 and 2013. “Epidemiological evidence shows that radiofrequency should be classified as a known human carcinogen. The existing FCC/IEEE and ICNIRP public safety limits are not adequate to protect public health.”

The BioInitiative reports nervous system effects in 68% of studies on radiofrequency radiation (144 of 211 studies) in 2014. This has increased from 63% in 2012 (93 of 150 studies) in 2012. Studies of extremely-low frequency radiation are reported to cause nervous system effects in 90% of the 105 studies available in 2014. Genetic effects (damage to DNA) from radiofrequency radiation is reported in 65% (74 of 114 studies); and 83% (49 of 59 studies) of extremely-low frequency studies.

Mobile wireless devices like phones and tablets are big sources of unnecessary biological stress to the mind and body that can chip away at resilience over time. The Report warns against wireless in schools. Schools should provide internet access without Wi-Fi.

"It is essentially an unregulated experiment on children's health and learning. Microwave from wireless tech disrupts thinking – what could be worse for learning? Technology can be used more safely with wired devices that do not produce these biologically-disruptive levels of microwave radiation" said Cindy Sage, Co-Editor of the BioInitiative Report.

Federal programs like ConnectED and E-Rate are calling for wireless classrooms while ignoring the health evidence. Hyperactivity, concentration problems, anxiety, irritability, disorientation, distracted behavior, sleep disorders, and headaches are reported in clinical studies.

Government reviews on health impacts of wireless radiofrequency radiation from the European Union and Australia continue to be inconclusive largely because they require certainty before issuing warnings. The FCC review of health impacts from wireless technologies is still underway, but has not affected the federal push for wireless classrooms.

See: www.bioinitiative.org
Contact: info@bioinitiative.org
David O. Carpenter, MD dcarpenter@albany.edu

Hat Tip: Memory Hole Blog

Related Activist Post Articles:

For 100 years, the federal government has usurped powers not delegated to it in our Constitution. What should we do about it?

(this is a very well done and simple explanation of the predicament we are in, and really the ultimate answer to it  . .  many people, including me, realizes that so much/all of the laws, actions and beaurocracies being used against the people are unconstitutional . .  but do not really know "why" or "how" they are unconstitutional. . . . as well as the snakes everywhere who put themselves out there as "patriotic" and "conservative" on the radio, tv, etc, and get a following (Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glen Beck, Mark Levine, etc, etc) that ultimately are working for the globalists, whether they realize it or not . . the answer is to NOT CHANGE the Constitution, but to enforce it . . which would eliminate practically ALL of the tyranny . .  simple, but very, very difficult . . . )



By Publius Huldah
19, 2014

For 100 years, the federal government has usurped powers not delegated to it in our Constitution. 

What should we do about it? Should we reclaim our existing Constitution and put an end to the usurpations?

Or should we “modernize”the Constitution by delegating to the federal government the powers it has usurped – so as to legalize what is now unconstitutional?

Mark Levin begins “The Liberty Amendments” by saying he doesn’t believe the Constitution requires “modernization through amendments”. But he then proposes a series of amendments, six of which modernize our Constitution to delegate to the federal government most of the powers it has usurped during the last 100 years. 

And each of his six amendments does the opposite of what its title promises .I’ll show you.[1]
Levin’s amendment to “limit the federal bureaucracy” [p 99-100 of his book]
George Washington’s cabinet had four members: Secretary of State, Secretary of War, Secretary of the Treasury, and Attorney General. Those functions are authorized by our Constitution.[2]

But today there are numerous agencies in the Executive Branch of the federal government. Where is the constitutional authority? What Article, Section, and Clause authorizes the Departments of Agriculture, Education, Energy, Labor, Transportation, HHS, HUD, DHS, EPA, SBA, etc., etc., etc.?

There is no constitutional authority! Accordingly, all these agencies are unconstitutional as outside the scope of the powers delegated in our Constitution. 

Well then, a person who wanted to “limit the federal bureaucracy” would demand that these agencies be closed,and their functions returned to the States and The People, right?
But Mark Levin doesn’t do this. Section1 of his amendment legalizes all these agencies.It says:
“All federal departments and agencies shall expire if said departments and agencies are not individually reauthorized in stand-alone reauthorization bills every three years by a majority vote of the House of Representatives and the Senate.”
As long as Congress periodically “reauthorizes” the agencies– they remain.
Levin’s amendment thus changes the constitutional standard for whether an executive agency lawfully exists from whether it carries out an enumerated power [as in Washington’s Cabinet] to whatever the President wants and Congress agrees to. Do you see?

Now look at Section 2 of Levin’s amendment to “limit the federal bureaucracy.” It says:
“All Executive Branch regulations exceeding an economic burden of $100 million, as determined jointly by the Government Accountability Office and the Congressional Budget Office, shall be submitted to a permanent Joint Committee of Congress, hereafter the Congressional Delegation Oversight Committee, for review and approval prior to their implementation.”
Article I, §1, of our Constitution says only Congress may make laws.[3] But since Woodrow Wilson, executive agencies in the federal government have been churning out regulations which govern all aspects of our lives. These comprise the now gigantic Code of Federal Regulations.

All these regulations are unconstitutional as in violation of Art. I, §1![4]

Well then, one would expect that a person who wanted to “limit the federal bureaucracy” would demand the repeal of existing regulation sand an end to all future rulemaking, right?
Not Levin!Section2 of his amendment legalizes all existing regulations and the rule making process. Levin’s “fix” is merely to form a congressional committee to review certain regulations before they are imposed on the American People.

And so,federal executive agencies will continue to churn out millions of pages of regulations – but now, they will be constitutional because Levin’s amendment makes it all lawful.

Do you see? Levin’s amendment legalizes the status quo and does the opposite of what he claims.

Levin’s amendment “to limit federal spending”(p 73 -74)

Our Constitution limits federal spending to the enumerated powers. If you go through the Constitution and highlight the powers delegated to Congress or the President, you will have a complete list of the objects on which Congress may lawfully spend money. That is how our Framers controlled federal spending. It is the enumerated powers which limit spending – not the amount of revenue the federal government generates or the size of the GDP.Do you see?

The reason we have a crushing debt is because for 100 years, the federal government has ignored the limits –already set forth in the Constitution - on its spending.

Well then, a person who wanted to “limit federal spending” would demand that Congress begin to downsize the federal government and restrict spending to the enumerated powers, right? 

But Levin doesn’t do this. Section 1 of his amendment legalizes all the spending which is now unconstitutional as outside the enumerated powers. It says:
“Congress shall adopt a preliminary fiscal year budget no later than the first Monday in May for the following fiscal year, and submit said budget to the President for consideration.”
Levin’s amendment thus legalizes the unconstitutional status quo where the President and Congress adopt a “budget” and spend money on whatever they put in the budget! Levin would permit Congress and the President to lawfully spend money on whatever they want – spending which is now unlawful because our Constitution doesn’t authorize it.

Furthermore, Levin’s amendment does nothing to control federal spending. While Sections 3 & 4 of his amendment pretend to limit spending to revenues or to a percentage of the GDP; Sections6 & 7 permit Congress to suspend the spending limit and continue to raise the national debt.[5]

Levin’s amendment “to limit federal taxing” (p 75)

Our Constitution doesn’t permit the federal government to levy taxes so that Congress and the President will have the funds to spend on whatever they want.

Congress may lawfully levy taxes only to raise the funds to carry out the enumerated powers. Article I, §8, clauses 1 & 2 say:
“The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common defense and general Welfare of the United States …” [and] “To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;”
Immediately after clauses 1 & 2 follows the list of enumerated powers we delegated to Congress for the Country at Large.[6]

Add to this short list of enumerated powers, the “housekeeping powers” itemized elsewhere in the Constitution (e.g., the census); the salaries authorized by Art. I, §6, cl. 1; Art.II, §1, next to last clause; Art. III, §1, cl. 1, and others on the civil list; and you see the purposes for which Congress is authorized to levy and collect taxes, borrow money, and spend money, for the Country at Large.[7]

So! Congress should not be levying taxes except to generate revenue for its constitutional functions. If Congress restricted its spending to those few powers delegated in the Constitution, the federal government would need very little money from us.
One would expect that a person who wants to“limit federal taxation” would demand that the federal government stop taxing to raise money to spend on unconstitutional purposes, right?
Not Levin! While his amendment limits the federal income tax to 15% of income – it institutionalizes the present practice where Congress lays & collects taxes for any purposes whatsoever.[8]

Levin’s amendment “to protect private property” (p 137)

The federal government has no lawful authority to own land for any purpose other than those enumerated in the Constitution: Article I, §8, next to last clause, permits the federal government to own the District of Columbia [which was not to exceed “ten Miles square”], and Places purchased with the Consent of the State legislatures for the erection of forts, dock-Yards, and other needful buildings (e.g., federal courthouses, post offices) to carry out the enumerated powers.

The federal government has no lawful authority to own national parks, grazing areas, forests, and such.[9]

And the federal government has no lawful authority to restrict peoples’ use of their own land. Now here in our Constitution did we delegate that power to the federal government! Accordingly, all federal laws and regulations (EPA,etc.) which pretend to restrict an owner’s use of his land are unconstitutional as outside the scope of powers delegated.

Furthermore, the States’ and local governments’ powers of eminent domain and other “takings” of private land are addressed in their own State Constitutions and laws. This is NOT a federal issue!

But Levin’s amendment “to protect private property” changes all of the above. It says:
“When any governmental entity acts not to secure a private property right against actions that injure property owners, but to take property for a public use from a property owner by actual seizure or through regulation, which taking results in a market value reduction of the property, interference with the use of the property, or a financial loss to the property owner exceeding $10,000, the government shall compensate fully said property owner for such losses.”
Levin’s amendment:
Changes the constitutional standard for federal ownership of lands from carrying out an enumerated power to what ever someone in the federal government deems a “public use [which can be anything];

Legalizes what are now unconstitutional holdings of lands by the federal government – such as grazing lands; 

Legalizes “takings” by regulation – restrictions via regulations on the use of private lands - by all levels of government;

Takes from the States and The People their retained powers over eminent domain and regulatory takings, and makes it a federal issue under the control of the federal government;[10] and

Provides that as long as a taking does not reduce the value of the property by more than $10,000, the governments don’t have to pay the property owner one red cent. So! If your local or State or federal government takes some of your land, or restrict its use by regulation,Levin’s amendment requires compensation to be paid if the “taking” exceeds $10,000. If the government decides that your loss is less than $10,000, you eat the loss. The amendment legalizes government theft of private property.

Levin’s amendment “to protect the vote” (p 183-184)

Before our Constitution was ratified, the States qualified & registered voters. Qualifications were set forth in their State Constitutions, and requirements differed from State to State. This power was expressly retained by the States with Art. I, §2, cl. 1, U.S. Constitution.[11]

The four voting amendments reduced this retained power of the States, and delegated to the federal government power to stop States from denying suffrage to citizens on account of race (15th Amendment), sex (19th Amendment), failure to pay a tax (24th Amendment), or age for citizens eighteen years of age or older (26th Amendment).

Except as restricted by these four amendments, the States retain their pre-existing power to set qualifications for registering citizens to vote, as long as they do not deny it on account of race, sex, failure to pay a tax, or age for those 18 years or more. States remain free to deny registration on other grounds – such as conviction of a felony or illiteracy. And of course, States retained power to restrict voting to citizens! 

But the retained powers of the States to set voter qualifications for registration were diminished far beyond the scope of the amendments, due to usurpations by the federal government, and because the States forgot that they retained at Art. I, §2, cl. 1 most of their original power to qualify & register voters.

In Arizona’s Proposition 200: What The Constitution Really Says About Voter Qualifications & Exposing The “Elections Clause” Argument, I show how the federal government infringed upon the States’ retained powers over voter qualifications & registration; and how the two judges in that case wrongly ruled that Arizona could not require applicants for registration to provide proof of citizenship!

So! What should we do about non-citizens voting? Here is a novel idea: The States should man up and reclaim their powers retained by Art. I, §2, cl. 1; tell Eric Holder to take a hike; require all currently registered voters to provide proof of citizenship; and refuse to register new voters unless they provide proof of citizenship. Enforce the Constitution we have!

But Section 1 of Levin’s amendment “to protect the vote” says:
“Citizens in every state, territory, and the District of Columbia shall produce valid photographic identification documents demonstrating evidence of their citizenship, issued by the state government for the state in which the voter resides, as a requirement for registering to vote and voting in any primary or general election for President, Vice President, and members of Congress.”
Levin’s amendment (it has 5 Sections) rewards the federal government for unlawfully forbidding States from requiring applicants to prove they are citizens, by transferring more power over voter qualifications & registration to the federal government.[10]

But Levin’s amendment does even more harm than vesting in the federal government a power it already usurped - it ushers in a national ID card. Who thinks the feds won’t dictate the contents of the card and keep copies? [Do you really think a national ID card is a great idea?]

To add insult to injury, Levin’s amendment doesn’t even prohibit non-citizens from voting – it merely requires citizens to get an ID card before they can register to vote. Non-citizens are not required to get ID cards. The supreme Court (which will now lawfully have judicial power over this issue) will decide whether aliens can vote. 

Levin’s amendment “to promote free enterprise” (p 117)

In Federalist No. 22 (4th para) and Federalist No. 42 (11th&12th paras), Hamilton & Madison explain the original intent of the “interstate commerce” clause: It is to prohibit States from imposing tolls &tariffs on articles of merchandize as they are transported through the States for purposes of buying and selling. Until the mid-1930’s, this was widely understood. Here is a full proof of the original intent of that clause and the story of how the supreme Court usurped power over interstate commerce.

The original intent of that clause is still the supreme Law of the Land![12] So the States must man up and enforce that original intent. They must ignore - nullify - all pretended federal laws, regulations,and judicial opinions which are contrary to that original intent. 

Levin’s amendment “to promote free enterprise” says:
“SECTION 1: Congress’ power to regulate Commerce is not a plenary grant of power to the federal government to regulate and control economic activity but a specific grant of power limited to preventing states from impeding commerce and trade between and among the several states.”
“SECTION 2: Congress’s power to regulate Commerce does not extend to activity within a state, whether or not it affects interstate commerce; nor does it extend to compelling an individual or entity to participate in commerce or trade.”
Section 1 broadens the powers of the federal government from prohibiting States from imposing tolls &tariffs on articles of merchandize as they are transported through the States for purposes of buying and selling, to prohibiting the States from doing anything which “impedes” commerce and trade between and among the States.

 Many things can be said to “impede” commerce and trade. And who will decide what “impedes” and what doesn’t “impede”? Five judges on the supreme Court.

Section 2 mentions two instances where Congress’ power to regulate Commerce does not extend. This is dangerous because of the legal maxim, Expressio Unius Est Exclusio Alterius (the expression of one thing is the exclusion of the other).

Accordingly, Congress’ power to regulate commerce would extend to other instances. Which ones? We don’t know - the supreme Court will decide – on a case by case basis.


Levin’s amendments legalize - make constitutional - the very abuses they purport to correct, nullify the natural rights of the people, and fundamentally change the constitutional design.
Even though our Constitution is not being enforced, it still declares this federal government lawless! The true rule of law is still on our side, but not for much longer if we foolishly allow our Constitution to be re-written.

1. Telling the Truth about a person’s proposals isn’t “demonizing” him. People angrily reject valid criticism of Levin’s proposals because they have made an idol of him. If their loyalty were to Truth - instead of to their idol - they would want to be set straight.
2. Article II, §2, and:
Secretary of State: Art. I, §8, cl. 3
Secretary of Treasury: Art. I, §2, cl.3; Art.I, §8, cl. 1; Art.I, §9, cl.4-7; Art. VI, cl. 1
Secretary of War: Art. I, §8, clauses 11-14
Attorney General: Art. I, §8, cl. 6, 10&17; Art.III, §§2&3; Art. IV, §2, cl.2
3. Article I, §1, says: “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States…” [emphasis mine]
4. They are also unconstitutional as outside the scope of powers delegated to the federal government.
5. I explain the problems with “balanced budget” amendments here.
6. These are the enumerated powers over the Country at Large listed at Art. I, §8:
Clause 3: regulate “commerce” [For the Truth about the “commerce clause”, go here];
Clause 4: uniform laws on naturalization and bankruptcies;
Clause 5: coin money & regulate its value, and fix standard of weights & measures;
Clause 6: punish counterfeiting;
Clause 7: establish post offices & post roads;
Clause 8: issue patents ©rights;
Clause 9: set up federal courts inferior to the supreme court;
Clause 10: punish piracies & felonies on the high seas and offenses against the Law of Nations;
Clauses 11-14: war, letters of marque & reprisal, Army & Navy, and rules for the military
Clause 15-16: the Militia.

7. The anti-federalists objected to Art. I, §8, cl. 1 & 2. They claimed:
“…the power ‘to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, to pay the debts, and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States,’ amounts to an unlimited commission to exercise every power which may be alleged to be necessary for the common defense or general welfare.”
James Madison answered in Federalist No. 41 (last 4 paras) that clauses 1 & 2 permit Congress to levy taxes & borrow money only to carry out the enumerated powers! Madison said:
“Had no other enumeration or definition of the powers of the Congress been found in the Constitution, than the general expressions just cited, the authors of the objection might have had some color for it…But what color can the objection have, when a specification of the objects alluded to by these general terms immediately follows, and is not even separated by a longer pause than a semicolon? … Nothing is more natural nor common than first to use a general phrase, and then to explain and qualify it by a recital of particulars. But the idea of an enumeration of particulars which neither explain nor qualify the general meaning … is an absurdity…” [boldface mine]
So!Article I, §8, cl.1 is merely a “general expression,” the meaning of which is “ascertained and limited” by the clauses which “immediately follow” it.In other words, clauses 1 & 2 grant to Congress the power to raise money; and clauses 3-16 enumerate the objects on which Congress may appropriate the money so raised, thus limiting clauses 1 & 2. Do you see?

8. Levin’s amendment also corrects – on behalf of the feds - the following: When the 16th Amendment was ratified, “income” apparently didn’t include “wages.” Accordingly, it would be unconstitutional to force people to pay “income” taxes on “wages” - and such would thus be a proper object of nullification by States. But Levin’s amendment legalizes the status quo and rips this remedy from the States.
9. When our Constitution was ratified,the new federal government acquired (from its predecessor) the Western Territory (Federalist No. 7, 2nd & 3rd paras, and Federalist No. 43 at 5.) over which the new federal government was delegated, by Art. IV, §3, general legislative powers.As the Territory was broken up into new States, the general legislative powers would expire and sovereignty [except as to the few powers delegated exclusively to the new federal government] would be transferred to the new State.
10. Amendments to the Constitution generally increase the powers of the federal government: They usher in implementing federal statutes & executive agency regulations, and judicial power over the issue is transferred to the federal courts. Art III, §2, cl.1, says, “The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases … arising under this Constitution …” Do you really not see?
11. Article I, §2, cl. 1, says:
“The House of Representatives shall be composed of members chosen every second Year by the People of the several States, and the Electors in each State shall have the Qualifications requisite for Electors of the most numerous Branch of the State Legislature.” [boldface mine]
So! Whoever votes in elections for their State House, is eligible to vote for members of the federal House of Representatives. See also Federalist No. 57 (5th para) & Federalist No. 52 (2nd para).

12. Article VI, cl. 2, the “supremacy clause”, states that only our Constitution, federal laws made “in Pursuance” of the Constitution, and Treaties made “under the Authority of the United States”, shall be the supreme Law of the Land. Supreme Court opinions are NEVER part of the supreme Law of the Land! But we have wrongly made them the only Law of our Land. 

Publius Huldah is a retired attorney who now lives in Tennessee. Before getting a law degree, she got a degree in philosophy where she specialized in political philosophy and epistemology (theories of knowledge). She now writes extensively on the U.S. Constitution, using the Federalist Papers to prove its original meaning and intent. She also shows how federal judges and politicians have ignored Our Constitution and replaced it with their personal opinions and beliefs.h
E-Mail: publiushuldah@gmail.com


The Black Sheep tries to warn its friends with the truth it has seen, unfortunately herd mentality kicks in for the Sheeple, and they run in fear from the black sheep and keep to the safety of their flock.

Having tried to no avail to awaken his peers, the Black Sheep have no other choice but to unite with each other and escape the impending doom.

What color Sheep are you?